[CRS_META] EMWD charges?

[jwwright]

Just a question (ambivalent).
Does the new laws have any effect on this rule?
Probably most of these quotes are from gov't supported studies.

Regards

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Rae" <mikalra at cadvision.com>
To: "Issues Related to List Rules/Management and the CR Society"
<crs_meta at lists.calorierestriction.org>
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 2:05 PM
Subject: Re: [CRS_META] EMWD charges?


> All:
>
> Tim Tyler wrote:
> > Tim wrote:
> >
> >> The current provider is EMWD (Bob may have mispoke):
> >>
> >> http://www.emwd.com/
> >
> > A web hosting company.
> >
> > It's a bit confusing, not knowing what's happening.
> >
> > Has the CRS been billed?  Could this turn into
> > a big issue, if, say a publisher went archive diving?
>
> Copyright violation is not a new issue. The List rules have said, at
> least as far back as 2000, that people should not even be posting full
> PubMed abstracts!! This was way before online full-text articles became
> available, let alone so readily.
>
> Then Al Pater came on the scene ... and unfortunately, no one has been
> willing to clamp down on his activities. I hope that we will now find
> the cojones to absolutely implement the long-standing rule: no more
> posting so much material from full-text papers, especially whole,
> unedited, multi- paragraph excerpts of irrelevant or redundant material
> -- let alone entire papers.
>
> This is needed for the quality of the List IAC.
>
> -Michael
>
> Thou hast no right but to do thy Will. Love is the law, love under will.
> --
> The MPrize <http://www.Mprize.org> : War Bonds for the Campaign Against
> Aging! Why I'm on board: http://www.cron-web.org/m-prize.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> CRS_META at lists.calorierestriction.org
> To change CRS_META mailing list settings or unsubscribe:
>
http://lists.calorierestriction.org/mailman/listinfo/crs_meta_lists.calorier
estriction.org